![]() ![]() Naval gun fire control potentially involves three levels of complexity: Though a ship rolls and pitches at a slower rate than a tank does, gyroscopic stabilization is extremely desirable. It is possible to control several same-type guns on a single platform simultaneously, while both the firing guns and the target are moving. Naval fire control resembles that of ground-based guns, but with no sharp distinction between direct and indirect fire. History of analogue fire control systems The Mark 37 Gun Fire Control System incorporated the Mark 1 computer, the Mark 37 director, a gyroscopic stable element along with automatic gun control, and was the first US Navy dual-purpose GFCS to separate the computer from the director. Digital computers would not be adopted for this purpose by the US until the mid-1970s however, it must be emphasized that all analog anti-aircraft fire control systems had severe limitations, and even the US Navy's Mark 37 system required nearly 1000 rounds of 5 in (127 mm) mechanical fuze ammunition per kill, even in late 1944. This gave American forces a technological advantage in World War II against the Japanese, who did not develop remote power control for their guns both the US Navy and Japanese Navy used visual correction of shots using shell splashes or air bursts, while the US Navy augmented visual spotting with radar. įor the US Navy, the most prevalent gunnery computer was the Ford Mark 1, later the Mark 1A Fire Control Computer, which was an electro-mechanical analog ballistic computer that provided accurate firing solutions and could automatically control one or more gun mounts against stationary or moving targets on the surface or in the air. The major components of a gun fire-control system are a human-controlled director, along with or later replaced by radar or television camera, a computer, stabilizing device or gyro, and equipment in a plotting room. ![]() As technology advanced, many of these functions were eventually handled fully by central electronic computers. systems that were controlled by electronic computers, which were integrated with the ship's missile fire-control systems and other ship sensors. Most US ships that are destroyers or larger (but not destroyer escorts except Brooke class DEG's later designated FFG's or escort carriers) employed gun fire-control systems for 5-inch (127 mm) and larger guns, up to battleships, such as Iowa class.īeginning with ships built in the 1960s, warship guns were largely operated by computerized systems, i.e. ![]() Ship gun fire-control systems ( GFCS) are analogue fire-control systems that were used aboard naval warships prior to modern electronic computerized systems, to control targeting of guns against surface ships, aircraft, and shore targets, with either optical or radar sighting. ![]() Mark 37 Director c1944 with Mark 12 (rectangular antenna) and Mark 22 "orange peel" ( December 2010) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. Integrating curvatures over beam length, the deflection, at some point along x-axis, should also be reversely proportional to I.The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Therefore, it can be seen from the former equation, that when a certain bending moment M is applied to a beam cross-section, the developed curvature is reversely proportional to the moment of inertia I. Where Ixy is the product of inertia, relative to centroidal axes x,y (=0 for the I/H section, due to symmetry), and Ixy' is the product of inertia, relative to axes that are parallel to centroidal x,y ones, having offsets from them d_. Where I' is the moment of inertia in respect to an arbitrary axis, I the moment of inertia in respect to a centroidal axis, parallel to the first one, d the distance between the two parallel axes and A the area of the shape, equal to 2b t_f + (h-2t_f)t_w, in the case of a I/H section with equal flanges.įor the product of inertia Ixy, the parallel axes theorem takes a similar form: The so-called Parallel Axes Theorem is given by the following equation: The moment of inertia of any shape, in respect to an arbitrary, non centroidal axis, can be found if its moment of inertia in respect to a centroidal axis, parallel to the first one, is known. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |